linux-kernel - Re: selftests ublk UBLK_IO_F_NEED_REG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aFFL8DQufPXnerlm@fedora>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:05:20 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
	Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	kbusch@...nel.org, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: selftests ublk UBLK_IO_F_NEED_REG_BUF undeclared

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 04:27:31PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> The following build warnings / errors noticed while building the selftest/ublk
> with gcc-13 and clang-nightly toolchains on Linux next tree.
> 
> Please suggest if I am missing something in my build setup.
> 
> Regressions found on arm arm64 x86_64
>   -  selftests ublk
> 
> Regression Analysis:
>  - New regression? Yes
>  - Reproducibility? Yes
> 
> Build regression: selftests ublk UBLK_IO_F_NEED_REG_BUF undeclared
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> ## Build log
> 
>  CC       kublk

Please run 'make headers_install' before running the test.


Thanks,
Ming