lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFFozq_dzk8Qn7XN@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 15:08:30 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Workqueue: add WQ_PERCPU, system_dfl_wq and
 system_percpu_wq

Le Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 08:35:32AM -1000, Tejun Heo a écrit :
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 03:35:28PM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> > Marco Crivellari (3):
> >   Workqueue: add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq
> >   Workqueue: add new WQ_PERCPU flag
> >   [Doc] Workqueue: add WQ_PERCPU
> 
> Applied 1-3 to wq/for-6.17. I applied as-is but the third patch didn't need
> to be separate. Maybe something to consider for future.

If this is for the next merge window, I guess the easiest is to wait for it
before sending patches to other subsystems to convert them?

I guess we could shortcut that with providing a branch that other subsystems
could pull from but that doesn't look convenient...

Thanks.

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> tejun

-- 
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ