linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/780] 6.15.3-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025061858-reproduce-revolving-cae0@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:19:11 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
	conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com,
	Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.15 000/780] 6.15.3-rc1 review

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 12:58:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 05:15:08PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.15.3 release.
> > There are 780 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> This breaks the build of the arm64 selftests due to a change in nolibc,
> it appears that "tools/nolibc: properly align dirent buffer" is missing
> some dependency:
> 
> aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident -s -Os -nostdlib \
> 	-include ../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h -I../..\
> 	-static -ffreestanding -Wall za-fork.c /build/stage/build-work/kselftest/arm64/fp/za-fork-asm.o -o /build/stage/build-work/kselftest/arm64/fp/za-fork
> In file included from ./../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h:107,
>                  from <command-line>:
> ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h: In function ‘readdir_r’:
> ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:64: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘__nolibc_aligned_as’
>    62 |         char buf[sizeof(struct linux_dirent64) + NAME_MAX + 1] __nolibc_aligned_as(struct linux_dirent64);
>       |                                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:64: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__nolibc_aligned_as’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:62:84: error: expected expression before ‘struct’
>    62 |         char buf[sizeof(struct linux_dirent64) + NAME_MAX + 1] __nolibc_aligned_as(struct linux_dirent64);
>       |                                                                                    ^~~~~~
> ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:63:47: error: ‘buf’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>    63 |         struct linux_dirent64 *ldir = (void *)buf;
>       |                                               ^~~
> ./../../../../include/nolibc/dirent.h:63:47: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

Thanks for the report, I'll go drop all nolibc patches from the queues
for now.

greg k-h