[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8570dedab1a7478c39b31125ad279038fe31ac13.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:38:51 +0200
From: Jan Lübbe <jlu@...gutronix.de>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Ahmad Fatoum
<a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>, Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, Marek Vasut
<marex@...x.de>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Linus
Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz
Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT 00/15] gpio: sysfs: add a per-chip
export/unexport attribute pair
Hi Bartosz,
On Tue, 2025-06-10 at 16:38 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Following our discussion[1], here's a proposal for extending the sysfs
> interface with attributes not referring to GPIO lines by their global
> numbers in a backward compatible way.
>
> Long story short: there is now a new class device for each GPIO chip.
> It's called chipX where X is the ID of the device as per the driver
> model and it lives next to the old gpiochipABC where ABC is the GPIO
> base. Each new chip class device has a pair of export/unexport
> attributes which work similarly to the global ones under /sys/class/gpio
> but take hardware offsets within the chip as input, instead of the
> global numbers. Finally, each exported line appears at the same time as
> the global /sys/class/gpio/gpioABC as well as per-chip
> /sys/class/gpio/chipX/gpioY sysfs group.
>
> First, there are some documentation updates, followed by a set of
> updates to the sysfs code that's useful even without the new
> functionality. Then the actual implementation of a parallel GPIO chip
> entry not containing the base GPIO number in the name and the
> corresponding sysfs attribute group for each exported line that lives
> under the new chip class device. Finally: also allow to compile out the
> legacy parts leaving only the new elements of the sysfs ABI.
>
> This series passes the compatibility tests I wrote while working on the
> user-space compatibility layer for sysfs[2].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMRc=McUCeZcU6co1aN54rTudo+JfPjjForu4iKQ5npwXk6GXA@mail.gmail.com/
> [2] https://github.com/brgl/gpio-sysfs-compat-tests
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
thanks for implementing this! I tried it on one of our boards and noticed a few
things.
After unexporting a GPIO from the chipX dir, the subdirectory is not removed:
root@...tac-00006:/sys/class/gpio/chip9# echo 1 > export
root@...tac-00006:/sys/class/gpio/chip9# echo 1 > unexport
root@...tac-00006:/sys/class/gpio/chip9# ls -l gpio1/
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Jun 18 12:52 active_low
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Jun 18 12:52 direction
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Jun 18 12:52 edge
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Jun 18 12:52 value
Subsequent attempts to export it again fail.
The contents of /sys/kernel/debug/gpio don't really fit any more:
gpiochip10: GPIOs 660-663, parent: i2c/0-0024, pca9570, can sleep:
gpio-660 (DUT_PWR_EN |tacd ) out hi
gpio-661 (DUT_PWR_DISCH |tacd ) out lo
gpio-662 (DUT_PWR_ADCRST |reset ) out lo
The header is inconsistent: it uses the 'gpiochip' prefix, but not the base as
the old class devices in /sys/class/gpio/. Perhaps something like this?
chip10: GPIOs 0-2 (global IDs 660-663), parent: i2c/0-0024, pca9570, can sleep:
gpio-0 (660) (DUT_PWR_EN |tacd ) out hi
gpio-1 (661) (DUT_PWR_DISCH |tacd ) out lo
gpio-2 (662) (DUT_PWR_ADCRST |reset ) out lo
If GPIO_SYSFS_LEGACY is disabled, the global IDs could be hidden.
Unix permissions/ownership just works.
As far as I can see, this is basically everything I need to replace the old
global ID based GPIO access in labgrid. Thanks again! :)
Regards,
Jan
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists