[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <601853CD-F47A-452A-87AC-668E73A3E971@fw-web.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:50:13 +0200
From: Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
CC: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
arinc.unal@...nc9.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v5 1/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: support named IRQs
Am 18. Juni 2025 15:55:45 MESZ schrieb Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>:
>On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 03:07:12PM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
>>
>> Add named interrupts and keep index based fallback for existing
>> devicetrees.
>>
>> Currently only rx and tx IRQs are defined to be used with mt7988, but
>> later extended with RSS/LRO support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
>>
>> +static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /* future SoCs beginning with MT7988 should use named IRQs in dts */
>> + eth->irq[1] = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "tx");
>> + eth->irq[2] = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "rx");
>> + if (eth->irq[1] >= 0 && eth->irq[2] >= 0)
>> + return 0;
>
>I'd rather extend that logic and fall back to the legacy way only in case
>of -ENXIO. Ie. add here:
>
>if (eth->irq[1] != -ENXIO)
> return eth->irq[1];
>
>if (eth->irq[2] != -ENXIO)
> return eth->irq[2];
I would do this later after the consts are used
instead of index numbers,just to not add lines
that are changed later again.Better adding the
lines already with the consts.
>Maybe also output a warning at this point in case MTK_SHARED_INT is no
>set, to recommend users to update their device tree to named interrupts.
I understand the reason behind (documentation
which irq is used for which purpose),but
previous devicetrees of non-shared SoCs using
at least the reserved irq 0. Mt7986 has 0 and 3
defined in dts. That could be tricky in binding,
so my way was starting with irq names now for
new additions and leaving existing dts as they
are.
Maybe i should add the mt7988 ethernet binding change from my dts series here...
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists