[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250618110915.754e604f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 11:09:15 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri
Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Thomas
Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Indu
Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>, "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@....org>, Beau
Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>, Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/14] unwind_user: Add frame pointer support
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:52:01 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > +the_end:
> > + state->done = true;
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
>
> I'm thinking 'the_end' might be better named 'done' ?
I thought it was cute ;-) (BTW, I didn't name it).
But sure, I can update it to be something more common.
>
> Also, CFA here is Call-Frame-Address and RA Return-Address ?
I believe so. Do you want me to add a comment?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists