[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY8PR11MB7134B9350A5DF2AA69640D418972A@CY8PR11MB7134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:42:28 +0000
From: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com"
<marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, "Mauro
Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>, Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC/igen6: Fix NULL pointer dereference
Hi Tony,
> From: Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com>
> [...]
> >
> > This issue occurred because one memory controller was fused off by
>
> Maybe "disabled by BIOS" rather than "fused off by BIOS".
The phrase "disabled by BIOS" should be more appropriate.
Will update it in v2. Thanks.
> > the BIOS but the igen6_edac driver still checked all the memory
> > controllers, including this absent one, to identify the source of the
> [...]
> >
> > - if (lmc < res_cfg->num_imc)
> > + if (lmc < res_cfg->num_imc) {
> > igen6_printk(KERN_WARNING, "Expected %d mcs, but
> only %d detected.",
> > res_cfg->num_imc, lmc);
>
> KERN_WARNING seems overly dramatic. BIOS likely had good reasons to
> disable the memory controller (e.g. it isn't connected to any DIMM slots on
> the motherboard for this system). So there's nothing actually wrong that
> needs to be fixed.
Yes. That's true.
> KERN_INFO is enough. Perhaps KERN_DEBUG?
Will change the log level to "KERN_DEBUG" in v2 to reduce noise.
- Qiuxu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists