[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf0575c7-f78a-458c-b905-7baa7347c03f@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:57:47 -0700
From: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Anirudh Rayabharam <anirudh@...rudhrb.com>
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: smccc: support both conduits for getting hyp
UUID
On 6/18/2025 5:20 AM, Anirudh Rayabharam wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 09:06:48AM -0700, Roman Kisel wrote:
>>> (sorry for the delay, found the patch in the spam 🙁)
>>
>> "b4" shows the the mail server used for the patch submission
>> doesn't pass the DKIM check, so finding the patch in the spam seems
>
> How do you check this? I mean, what b4 command do you run?
>
> I think it should be fix now. Let's see...
"b4 am" was showing the failed DKIM check, and all good now!
| $ b4 am 20250521094049.960056-1-anirudh@...rudhrb.com
|
| Grabbing thread from
lore.kernel.org/all/20250521094049.960056-1-anirudh@...rudhrb.com/t.mbox.gz
| Analyzing 7 messages in the thread
| Looking for additional code-review trailers on lore.kernel.org
| Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
| ---
| ✓ [PATCH] firmware: smccc: support both conduits for getting hyp UUID
| + Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
| + Tested-by: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com> (✓
DKIM/linux.microsoft.com)
| + Reviewed-by: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com> (✓
DKIM/linux.microsoft.com)
| ---
| ✓ Signed: DKIM/anirudhrb.com
| ---
| Total patches: 1
| ---
| Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250521094049.960056-1-anirudh@anirudhrb.com
| Base: applies clean to current tree
| git checkout -b 20250521_anirudh_anirudhrb_com HEAD
| git am
./20250521_anirudh_firmware_smccc_support_both_conduits_for_getting_hyp_uuid.mbx
|
[...]
>> Anirudh had been OOF for some time and would be for another
>> week iiuc so I thought I'd reply.
>
> Thanks Roman!
My pleasure :)
>
> Regards,
> Anirudh
>
>>
>> The patch this depends on is 13423063c7cb
>> ("arm64: kvm, smccc: Introduce and use API for getting hypervisor UUID"),
>> and this patch has already been pulled into the Linus'es tree.
>>
>> As for routing, (arm-)soc should be good it appears as the change
>> is contained within the firmware drivers path. Although I'd trust more to your,
>> Arnd's or Wei's opinion than mine!
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Sudeep
--
Thank you,
Roman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists