linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: mc33xs2410: add support for temperature sensors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2m5el6kh4sjmopbnvovzzb7gefvbuvjphnzdz7hy2vnbcbstaw@g5gjndrfb4e5>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 20:00:19 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
To: Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@...il.com>
Cc: dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, 
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: mc33xs2410: add support for temperature sensors

Hello,

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:12:23PM +0200, Dimitri Fedrau wrote:
> Am Mon, May 19, 2025 at 03:47:26PM +0200 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> > Hello Dimitri,
> > 
> > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 02:40:28PM +0200, Dimitri Fedrau wrote:
> > > Perfering IS_REACHABLE over IS_ENABLED is fine for me. Is there a reason
> > > why you just didn't replace IS_ENABLED with IS_REACHABLE ?
> > 
> > Because if (IS_REACHABLE(...)) is nicer than #if IS_REACHABLE(...). It
> > has better compile coverage and is easier to parse for a human.
> > 
> Sorry, my question was not precise. Diff below is about the replacement
> of IS_ENABLED.

FTR: We resolved that question in a private conversation. I'm waiting
for a v3 now (but not holding my breath :-)

Best regards
Uwe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)