lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2vanc3xxtjx3ytcl2dwcu3vmn7d2ixpco3mj6p7qyloga5j25p@5ldwqxycaeko>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:30:56 +0530
From: Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, 
	Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@....com>, Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>, 
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>, 
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu/topology: Use initial APICID from XTOPOEXT
 on AMD/HYGON

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 07:29:21AM +0000, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Prior to the topology parsing rewrite and the switchover to the new
> parsing logic for AMD processors in commit c749ce393b8f ("x86/cpu: Use
> common topology code for AMD"), the "initial_apicid" on these platforms
> was:
> 
> - First initialized to the LocalApicId from CPUID leaf 0x1 EBX[31:24].
> 
> - Then overwritten by the ExtendedLocalApicId in CPUID leaf 0xb
>   EDX[31:0] on processors that supported topoext.
> 
> With the new parsing flow introduced in commit f7fb3b2dd92c ("x86/cpu:
> Provide an AMD/HYGON specific topology parser"), parse_8000_001e() now
> unconditionally overwrites the "initial_apicid" already parsed during
> cpu_parse_topology_ext().
> 
> Although this has not been a problem on baremetal platforms, on
> virtualized AMD guests that feature more than 255 cores, QEMU 0's out
> the CPUID leaf 0x8000001e on CPUs with "CoreID" > 255 to prevent
> collision of these IDs in EBX[7:0] which can only represent a maximum of
> 255 cores [1].
> 
> This results in the following FW_BUG being logged when booting a guest
> with more than 255 cores:
> 
>     [Firmware Bug]: CPU 512: APIC ID mismatch. CPUID: 0x0000 APIC: 0x0200
> 
> Rely on the APICID parsed during cpu_parse_topology_ext() from CPUID
> leaf 0x80000026 or 0xb and only use the APICID from leaf 0x8000001e if
> cpu_parse_topology_ext() failed (has_topoext is false).
> 
> On platforms that support the 0xb leaf (Zen2 or later, AMD guests on
> QEMU) or the extended leaf 0x80000026 (Zen4 or later), the
> "initial_apicid" is now set to the value parsed from EDX[31:0].
> 
> On older AMD/Hygon platforms that does not support the 0xb leaf but
> supports the TOPOEXT extension (Fam 0x15, 0x16, 0x17[Zen1], and Hygon),
> the current behavior is retained where "initial_apicid" is set using
> the 0x8000001e leaf.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/35ac5dfbcaa4b [1]
> Debugged-by: Naveen N Rao (AMD) <naveen@...nel.org>
> Debugged-by: Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@....com>
> Fixes: c749ce393b8f ("x86/cpu: Use common topology code for AMD")
> Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
> index fec849fff82f..2ff6988e020a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,13 @@ static bool parse_8000_001e(struct topo_scan *tscan, bool has_topoext)
>  
>  	cpuid_leaf(0x8000001e, &leaf);
>  
> -	tscan->c->topo.initial_apicid = leaf.ext_apic_id;
> +	/*
> +	 * Prefer initial_apicid parsed from CPUID leaf 0x8000026 or 0xb
> +	 * if available. Otherwise prefer the one from leaf 0x8000001e
> +	 * over 0x1.
> +	 */
> +	if (!has_topoext)
> +		tscan->c->topo.initial_apicid = leaf.ext_apic_id;

My understanding is that the rest of this function continues to work 
properly with an all-zero return value from CPUID leaf 0x8000001e - data 
from topoext is preferred where available, and other sources are used 
for llc_id.

And, this fixes the firmware bug warning seen during a guest boot in 
qemu for me, so for this patch:
Tested-by: Naveen N Rao (AMD) <naveen@...nel.org>


Thanks,
Naveen


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ