lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99e31fd7-e0b6-406f-bf4c-ceee8a0db93b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 11:57:54 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arch: arm64: dts: exynos7870-on7xelte: enable display
 panel support

On 12/06/2025 17:23, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote:
> Enable DECON and DSI nodes, and add the compatible display panel and
> appropriate panel timings for this device. Also, disable the
> simple-framebuffer node in favor of the panel.
> 
> This device has a 1080x1920 Synaptics TD4300 display panel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7870-on7xelte.dts | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7870-on7xelte.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7870-on7xelte.dts
> index eb97dcc415423f405d7df9b9869b2db3432fb483..86a7fc2554a137752862c37d27cf9813b3ac5514 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7870-on7xelte.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7870-on7xelte.dts
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ framebuffer@...00000 {
>  			height = <1920>;
>  			stride = <(1080 * 4)>;
>  			format = "a8r8g8b8";
> +
> +			status = "disabled";

This should be rather removed. What is the idea behind keeping disabled
node?


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ