lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5909446.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:17:45 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
 Peter Williams <peter@...ton.cx>, "Dumbre, Saket" <saket.dumbre@...el.com>,
 Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>
Subject:
 [PATCH v1] ACPICA: Refuse to evaluate a method if arguments are missing

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

As reported in [1], a platform firmware update that increased the number
of method parameters and forgot to update a least one of its callers,
caused ACPICA to crash due to use-after-free.

Since this a result of a clear AML issue that arguably cannot be fixed
up by the interpreter (it cannot produce missing data out of thin air),
address it by making ACPICA refuse to evaluate a method if the caller
attempts to pass fewer arguments than expected to it.

Closes: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/issues/1027 [1]
Reported-by: Peter Williams <peter@...ton.cx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---

This is an exception as it fixes a kernel crash on multiple platforms
affected by the defective platform firmware update.

I will take care of submitting an equivalent change to upstream
ACPICA later.

---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c
@@ -483,6 +483,13 @@
 		return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NULL_OBJECT);
 	}
 
+	if (this_walk_state->num_operands < obj_desc->method.param_count) {
+		ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Missing argument for method [%4.4s]",
+			    acpi_ut_get_node_name(method_node)));
+
+		return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_ARG);
+	}
+
 	/* Init for new method, possibly wait on method mutex */
 
 	status =




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ