lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H5CWK=sNCjFVCLq86A6ZPetux_uL9ZtnBf36TU09AKUVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 23:15:18 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@...inos.cn>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, 
	yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn, hengqi.chen@...il.com, martin.lau@...ux.dev, 
	eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, 
	john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, 
	haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, kernel@...0n.name, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	guodongtai@...inos.cn, youling.tang@...ux.dev, jianghaoran@...inos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] LoongArch: BPF: Update the code to rename
 validate_code to validate_ctx.

Hi, Chenghao,

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 6:51 PM Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@...inos.cn> wrote:
>
> Update the code to rename validate_code to validate_ctx.
> validate_code is used to check the validity of code.
> validate_ctx is used to check both code validity and table entry
> correctness.
Is this patch really needed? Just keep the same with ARM64?


Huacai

>
> Co-developed-by: George Guo <guodongtai@...inos.cn>
> Signed-off-by: George Guo <guodongtai@...inos.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@...inos.cn>
> ---
>  arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
> index 348ea3bfb..fa187f727 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
> @@ -1185,6 +1185,14 @@ static int validate_code(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
>                         return -1;
>         }
>
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int validate_ctx(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +       if (validate_code(ctx))
> +               return -1;
> +
>         if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->num_exentries != ctx->prog->aux->num_exentries))
>                 return -1;
>
> @@ -1293,7 +1301,7 @@ skip_init_ctx:
>         build_epilogue(&ctx);
>
>         /* 3. Extra pass to validate JITed code */
> -       if (validate_code(&ctx)) {
> +       if (validate_ctx(&ctx)) {
>                 bpf_jit_binary_free(header);
>                 prog = orig_prog;
>                 goto out_offset;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ