linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] iio: accel: sca3000: simplify by using newer infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aFQrgEw4zw9RSAO3@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 18:23:44 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Andrew Ijano <andrew.ijano@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
	andrew.lopes@...mni.usp.br, gustavobastos@....br,
	dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org,
	jstephan@...libre.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] iio: accel: sca3000: simplify by using newer
 infrastructure

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 03:20:06PM -0300, Andrew Ijano wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:41 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 09:24:19AM -0300, Andrew Ijano wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 2:56 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 6:17 AM Andrew Ijano <andrew.ijano@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The sca3000 driver is old and could be simplified by using newer
> > > > > infrastructure.
> > > >
> > > > I haven't found any reference to a base commit here. Have you
> > > > forgotten to use --base when preparing the series?
> > > > In any case, please clarify what this series is based on.
> > >
> > > Thank you for pointing this out! I think I forgot to use --base for
> > > it. In this case, should I submit a new version of the whole patchset
> > > with this information or is there a better way to do it?
> >
> > For now just reply here what is the base. I asked this question above.
> 
> Ok! No problem. So the base for this patchset is the commit
> 3c23416f69f2870bea83697d7ab03c6a8497daa7.

No such commit in the repository. :-(
You are doing something interesting here [1].

So, make sure you are based on the iio/testing or so, make sure that the base
commit is the one that may be found on git.kernel.org. Use that in the next
version. Due to above this version is ambiguous to even start reviewing it.

[1] I have connected IIO subsystem as a remote, so I have access to many trees
from kernel.org (but not to all of them).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko