lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <itx47uifmow4fcovhritufa76pfes4zsor4ttyf2bzzoycugvc@ivv65ci3wrwq>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 20:10:22 +0200
From: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
To: fourier.thomas@...il.com
Cc: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>, 
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: inside-secure: Fix `dma_unmap_sg()` nents value

IMO the patch subject could be improved, to remove the ` and to be more
descriptive. E.g.

"crypto: inside-secure: unmap DMA buffers using the original number of entries"

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 05:28:36PM +0200, fourier.thomas@...il.com wrote:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
> index d2b632193beb..1ef1ccfaaa95 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
> @@ -249,7 +249,10 @@ static int safexcel_handle_req_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
>  	safexcel_complete(priv, ring);
>  
>  	if (sreq->nents) {
> -		dma_unmap_sg(priv->dev, areq->src, sreq->nents, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +		dma_unmap_sg(priv->dev,
> +			     areq->src,
> +			     sg_nents_for_len(areq->src, areq->nbytes),
> +			     DMA_TO_DEVICE);

No need to put 'areq->src,' on a new line.

>  		sreq->nents = 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -497,7 +500,10 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_send_req(struct crypto_async_request *async, int ring,
>  			 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  unmap_sg:
>  	if (req->nents) {
> -		dma_unmap_sg(priv->dev, areq->src, req->nents, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +		dma_unmap_sg(priv->dev,
> +			     areq->src,
> +			     sg_nents_for_len(areq->src, areq->nbytes),
> +			     DMA_TO_DEVICE);

Same here.

Otherwise this looks good to me. With those fixed, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ