lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04497f71-498a-1d12-5cae-a6e0c4e77dc9@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:42:17 +0200
From: Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
 Rishi Gupta <gupt21@...il.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: mcp2221: set gpio pin mode

Hi all,

On 08.06.25 18:33, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> in case we have GPIOLIB enabled the gpio pins are used
> from the current driver as gpio pins. But may the gpio
> functions of this pins are not enabled in the flash
> of the chip and so gpio access fails.
> 
> In case CONFIG_IIO is not enabled we can prevent this
> issue of the driver simply by enabling the gpio mode
> for all pins.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>
> ---
> 
>   drivers/hid/hid-mcp2221.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)

Got message from patchwork:
The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in Patchwork:
"""
  * linux-i2c: HID: mcp2221: set gpio pin mode
      - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20250608163315.24842-1-hs@denx.de/
      - for: Linux I2C development
     was: New
     now: Not Applicable
"""

May I ask to which tree I should rebase my patch, so I can
resend? Just rebased my local patch to:

*   fb4d33ab452e - (origin/master, origin/HEAD, master) Merge tag '6.16-rc2-ksmbd-server-fixes' of 
git://git.samba.org/ksmbd

and it worked without problems.

And while at it, are there any issues with this patch or is it ready for
picking up?

Thanks!

bye,
Heiko
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-mcp2221.c b/drivers/hid/hid-mcp2221.c
> index 0f93c22a479f..f693e920dffe 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-mcp2221.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-mcp2221.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,27 @@ enum {
>   	MCP2221_ALT_F_NOT_GPIOD = 0xEF,
>   };
>   
> +/* MCP SRAM read offsets cmd: MCP2221_GET_SRAM_SETTINGS */
> +enum {
> +	MCP2221_SRAM_RD_GP0 = 22,
> +	MCP2221_SRAM_RD_GP1 = 23,
> +	MCP2221_SRAM_RD_GP2 = 24,
> +	MCP2221_SRAM_RD_GP3 = 25,
> +};
> +
> +/* MCP SRAM write offsets cmd: MCP2221_SET_SRAM_SETTINGS */
> +enum {
> +	MCP2221_SRAM_WR_GP_ENA_ALTER = 7,
> +	MCP2221_SRAM_WR_GP0 = 8,
> +	MCP2221_SRAM_WR_GP1 = 9,
> +	MCP2221_SRAM_WR_GP2 = 10,
> +	MCP2221_SRAM_WR_GP3 = 11,
> +};
> +
> +#define MCP2221_SRAM_GP_DESIGN_MASK		0x07
> +#define MCP2221_SRAM_GP_DIRECTION_MASK		0x08
> +#define MCP2221_SRAM_GP_VALUE_MASK		0x10
> +
>   /* MCP GPIO direction encoding */
>   enum {
>   	MCP2221_DIR_OUT = 0x00,
> @@ -607,6 +628,80 @@ static const struct i2c_algorithm mcp_i2c_algo = {
>   };
>   
>   #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)
> +static int mcp_gpio_read_sram(struct mcp2221 *mcp)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	memset(mcp->txbuf, 0, 64);
> +	mcp->txbuf[0] = MCP2221_GET_SRAM_SETTINGS;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mcp->lock);
> +	ret = mcp_send_data_req_status(mcp, mcp->txbuf, 64);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mcp->lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * If CONFIG_IIO is not enabled, check for the gpio pins
> + * if they are in gpio mode. For the ones which are not
> + * in gpio mode, set them into gpio mode.
> + */
> +static int mcp2221_check_gpio_pinfunc(struct mcp2221 *mcp)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	int needgpiofix = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IIO))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = mcp_gpio_read_sram(mcp);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MCP_NGPIO; i++) {
> +		if ((mcp->mode[i] & MCP2221_SRAM_GP_DESIGN_MASK) != 0x0) {
> +			dev_warn(&mcp->hdev->dev,
> +				 "GPIO %d not in gpio mode\n", i);
> +			needgpiofix = 1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!needgpiofix)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Set all bytes to 0, so Bit 7 is not set. The chip
> +	 * only changes content of a register when bit 7 is set.
> +	 */
> +	memset(mcp->txbuf, 0, 64);
> +	mcp->txbuf[0] = MCP2221_SET_SRAM_SETTINGS;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Set bit 7 in MCP2221_SRAM_WR_GP_ENA_ALTER to enable
> +	 * loading of a new set of gpio settings to GP SRAM
> +	 */
> +	mcp->txbuf[MCP2221_SRAM_WR_GP_ENA_ALTER] = 0x80;
> +	for (i = 0; i < MCP_NGPIO; i++) {
> +		if ((mcp->mode[i] & MCP2221_SRAM_GP_DESIGN_MASK) == 0x0) {
> +			/* write current GPIO mode */
> +			mcp->txbuf[MCP2221_SRAM_WR_GP0 + i] = mcp->mode[i];
> +		} else {
> +			/* pin is not in gpio mode, set it to input mode */
> +			mcp->txbuf[MCP2221_SRAM_WR_GP0 + i] = 0x08;
> +			dev_warn(&mcp->hdev->dev,
> +				 "Set GPIO mode for gpio pin %d!\n", i);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mcp->lock);
> +	ret = mcp_send_data_req_status(mcp, mcp->txbuf, 64);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mcp->lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static int mcp_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>   				unsigned int offset)
>   {
> @@ -1216,6 +1311,8 @@ static int mcp2221_probe(struct hid_device *hdev,
>   	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&hdev->dev, mcp->gc, mcp);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
> +
> +	mcp2221_check_gpio_pinfunc(mcp);
>   #endif
>   
>   #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_IIO)
> 

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-52   Fax: +49-8142-66989-80   Email: hs@...x.de

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ