[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250619000925.415528-1-pmalani@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:09:15 +0000
From: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...gle.com>
To: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: CPPC: idle cpu perf handling
This is a short series to address the unreliable feedback performance
counter values that are returned by the CPPC driver when the CPU is
idle.
The first patch exposes idle_cpu() to be accessible to modules, and the
second patch does the actual change of not reading the feedback counters
when we know that the CPU is idle.
v1(single patch): https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250614003601.1600784-1-pmalani@google.com/
Prashant Malani (2):
sched: Expose idle_cpu() to modules
cpufreq: CPPC: Dont read counters for idle CPUs
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 5 +++++
kernel/sched/syscalls.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
--
2.50.0.rc2.701.gf1e915cc24-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists