lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H4rFt3J6hD-eiNN5nihNR0cwMxPJQpq8LQWkx4km428og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:55:15 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, 
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, 
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>, 
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, 
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, 
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, 
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, 
	kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, 
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] mips: Handle KCOV __init vs inline mismatches

Hi, Kees,

On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 12:41 PM Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> When KCOV is enabled all functions get instrumented, unless
> the __no_sanitize_coverage attribute is used. To prepare for
> __no_sanitize_coverage being applied to __init functions, we have to
> handle differences in how GCC's inline optimizations get resolved. For
> mips this requires forcing a function to be inline with __always_inline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
> ---
> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
> Cc: <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/mips/include/asm/time.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/time.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/time.h
> index e855a3611d92..044cff0e0764 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/time.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/time.h
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static inline int mips_clockevent_init(void)
>   */
>  extern int init_r4k_clocksource(void);
>
> -static inline int init_mips_clocksource(void)
> +static __always_inline int init_mips_clocksource(void)
Similar to x86 and arm, I prefer to mark it as __init rather than
__always_inline.

Huacai

>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CSRC_R4K
>         return init_r4k_clocksource();
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ