[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250619111350.GF1613376@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:13:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.maria.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>,
"Fabio M . De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] cleanup: Introduce ACQUIRE(), a guard() for
conditional locks
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 10:04:08PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Note, all the code in patch1 is Peter's I just wrapped it in a changelog
> and added some commentary. Peter, forgive me if you were still in the
> process of circling back to this topic. I marked the patch attributed to
> you as: "Not-yet-signed-off-by". Otherwise, my motivation for going
> ahead with a formal submission are the multiple patchsets in my review /
> development queue where I would like to use ACQUIRE().
Definitely a case of too many balls in the air. Feel free to make that
Signed-off-by, and also:
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
for the patches that were sent my way. Thanks for the changelogs and
pushing this ahead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists