linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next 2/8] net/mlx5: HWS, remove incorrect comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250619115522.68469-3-mbloch@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 14:55:16 +0300
From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Andrew
 Lunn" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: <saeedm@...dia.com>, <gal@...dia.com>, <leonro@...dia.com>,
	<tariqt@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
	<corbet@....net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Yevgeny
 Kliteynik" <kliteyn@...dia.com>, Vlad Dogaru <vdogaru@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch
	<mbloch@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/8] net/mlx5: HWS, remove incorrect comment

From: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>

Removing incorrect comment section that is probably some
copy-paste artifact.

Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Dogaru <vdogaru@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c
index 9e057f808ea5..665e6e285db5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c
@@ -876,8 +876,6 @@ int mlx5hws_bwc_rule_create_simple(struct mlx5hws_bwc_rule *bwc_rule,
 
 	/* At this point the rule wasn't added.
 	 * It could be because there was collision, or some other problem.
-	 * If we don't dive deeper than API, the only thing we know is that
-	 * the status of completion is RTE_FLOW_OP_ERROR.
 	 * Try rehash by size and insert rule again - last chance.
 	 */
 
-- 
2.34.1