[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250619122157.GB21372@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:21:58 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com,
jgg@...pe.ca, jhubbard@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, peterx@...hat.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [mm?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in
do_sync_mmap_readahead
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 11:57:05AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 19/06/2025 10:52, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed 18-06-25 05:56:30, syzbot wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> syzbot found the following issue on:
> >>
> >> HEAD commit: bc6e0ba6c9ba Add linux-next specific files for 20250613
> >> git tree: linux-next
> >> console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=108c710c580000
> >> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2f7a2e4d17ed458f
> >> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8e4be574cb8c40140a2a
> >> compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.6 (++20250514063057+1e4d39e07757-1~exp1~20250514183223.118), Debian LLD 20.1.6
> >> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=148c710c580000
> >> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=179025d4580000
> >>
> >> Downloadable assets:
> >> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/2430bb0465cc/disk-bc6e0ba6.raw.xz
> >> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/436a39deef0a/vmlinux-bc6e0ba6.xz
> >> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e314ca5b1eb3/bzImage-bc6e0ba6.xz
> >>
> >> The issue was bisected to:
> >>
> >> commit 3b61a3f08949297815b2c77ae2696f54cd339419
> >> Author: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
> >> Date: Mon Jun 9 09:27:27 2025 +0000
> >>
> >> mm/filemap: allow arch to request folio size for exec memory
> >
> > Indeed. The crash is in:
> >
> > fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(vmf, fpin);
> > if (vm_flags & VM_EXEC) {
> > /*
> > * Allow arch to request a preferred minimum folio order for
> > * executable memory. This can often be beneficial to
> > * performance if (e.g.) arm64 can contpte-map the folio.
> > * Executable memory rarely benefits from readahead, due to its
> > * random access nature, so set async_size to 0.
> > *
> > * Limit to the boundaries of the VMA to avoid reading in any
> > * pad that might exist between sections, which would be a waste
> > * of memory.
> > */
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
> > unsigned long start = vma->vm_pgoff;
> > ^^^^ here
> > which is not surprising because we've unlocked mmap_sem (or vma lock) just
> > above this if and thus vma could have been released before we got here. The
> > easiest fix is to move maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io() below this if. There's
> > nothing in there that would be problematic with the locks still held.
>
> Thanks for the quick analysis, Jan! Ouch...
>
> This is still in mm-unstable I believe, so I'll send a fix-up patch to Andrew to
> move the unlock as you suggest.
>
> By the way, I don't think I was included on the original report; Is there a way
> I can sign up to be included on patched I authored in future?
Your address looks like it's on To:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/6852b77e.a70a0220.79d0a.0214.GAE@google.com
but maybe you redirect syzbot reports to the SP^H^HIMPORTANT folder?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists