[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87plez7w18.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 14:31:15 +0200
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
To: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor"
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo"
<gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Alice
Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@...nel.org>, "Luis Chamberlain"
<mcgrof@...nel.org>, "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, "Nicolas
Schier" <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
"Adam Bratschi-Kaye" <ark.email@...il.com>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, "Petr Pavlu" <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, "Daniel Gomez"
<da.gomez@...sung.com>, "Simona Vetter" <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>, "Greg
KH" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Fiona Behrens" <me@...enk.dev>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
<linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/6] rust: module: update the module macro with
module parameter support
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org> writes:
> On Thu Jun 12, 2025 at 3:40 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> +
>> + fn emit_params(&mut self, info: &ModuleInfo) {
>> + let Some(params) = &info.params else {
>> + return;
>> + };
>> +
>> + for param in params {
>> + let ops = param_ops_path(¶m.ptype);
>> +
>> + // Note: The spelling of these fields is dictated by the user space
>> + // tool `modinfo`.
>> + self.emit_param("parmtype", ¶m.name, ¶m.ptype);
>> + self.emit_param("parm", ¶m.name, ¶m.description);
>
> I just read this part again and I want to voice my dissatisfaction with
> these key names. (not that you can do anything about that :)
>
>> +
>> + write!(
>> + self.param_buffer,
>> + "
>> + pub(crate) static {param_name}:
>
> Does this need to be accessed by anything else except the static below?
> If no, then can we move it inside of that static? So
>
> #[link_section = \"__param\"]
> #[used]
> static __{module_name}_{param_name}_struct: ::kernel::module_param::RacyKernelParam = {
> static {param_name}:
> ::kernel::module_param::ModuleParamAccess<{param_type}> =
> ::kernel::module_param::ModuleParamAccess::new({param_default});
> // ...
> };
It is used to access the value of the parameter from the module. If you
reduce visibility you will get an error when trying to read the
parameter value:
RUSTC samples/rust/rust_minimal.o
error[E0425]: cannot find value `test_parameter` in module `module_parameters`
--> /home/aeh/src/linux-rust/module-params/samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:31:33
|
31 | *module_parameters::test_parameter.get()
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in `module_parameters`
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists