[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFQMrXRzui58krqA@zinc>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:12:13 +0900
From: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: sm750fb: rename 'proc_setBLANK'
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 04:26:10PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 11:15:55PM +0900, Kisub Choe wrote:
> > Rename 'proc_setBLANK' to 'proc_setBLANK' to
>
> That doesn't rename anything :(
Rename 'proc_setBLANK' to 'proc_set_blank' to
>
>
>
> > conform with kernel style guidelines as reported by checkpatch.pl
> >
> > CHECK: Avoid CamelCase: <proc_setBLANK>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> > index 1d929aca399c..bb2ade6030c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> > @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int lynxfb_ops_blank(int blank, struct fb_info *info)
> > pr_debug("blank = %d.\n", blank);
> > par = info->par;
> > output = &par->output;
> > - return output->proc_setBLANK(output, blank);
> > + return output->proc_set_blank(output, blank);
> > }
> >
> > static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
> > @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
> > crtc->ypanstep = 1;
> > crtc->ywrapstep = 0;
> >
> > - output->proc_setBLANK = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
> > + output->proc_set_blank = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
> > hw_sm750le_set_blank : hw_sm750_set_blank;
>
> Why do we even need this function pointer? Why not just do the check
> above when it is called instead of this indirection?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Dear Greg,
Here is the updated patch with revised commit message. No code changes.
Regards,
Kisub Choe.
>From 9c32c6f5091c8babe54bfde7b3a6de47d9026a55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 22:55:00 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: rename 'proc_setBLANK'
Rename 'proc_setBLANK' to 'proc_set_blank' to
conform with kernel style guidelines as reported by checkpatch.pl
CHECK: Avoid CamelCase: <proc_setBLANK>
Signed-off-by: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 4 ++--
drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
index 1d929aca399c..bb2ade6030c2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int lynxfb_ops_blank(int blank, struct fb_info *info)
pr_debug("blank = %d.\n", blank);
par = info->par;
output = &par->output;
- return output->proc_setBLANK(output, blank);
+ return output->proc_set_blank(output, blank);
}
static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
crtc->ypanstep = 1;
crtc->ywrapstep = 0;
- output->proc_setBLANK = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
+ output->proc_set_blank = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
hw_sm750le_set_blank : hw_sm750_set_blank;
/* chip specific phase */
sm750_dev->accel.de_wait = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h
index 9cf8b3d30aac..40051798efbf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ struct lynxfb_output {
*/
void *priv;
- int (*proc_setBLANK)(struct lynxfb_output *output, int blank);
+ int (*proc_set_blank)(struct lynxfb_output *output, int blank);
};
struct lynxfb_par {
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists