[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250620035816.GA21846@nxa18884-linux>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:58:16 +0800
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org" <arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for
scmi cpufreq
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 11:16:44AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 10:09:44PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:26:42PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>> >Revert to old behaviour and driver request fw_devlink dependencies to
>> >be created if they rely on them. I am not sure if that is better approach.
>>
>> This requires to update various drivers(clk,power,perf,pinctrl,regulator) to
>> set the flag SCMI_DEV_SET_FWNODE.
>>
>> Using SCMI_DEV_NO_FWNODE would avoid updating the various drivers.
>>
>
>Agreed and good point.
>
>> Anyway, you decide which to go :)
>
>Still undecided 🙁
Is this still in you list?
Thanks,
Peng.
>
>--
>Regards,
>Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists