linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Workqueue: add WQ_PERCPU, system_dfl_wq and system_percpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAofZF7xVETGVzrpHdMghcGDwNvw3jVumFWwWMqd+tq4Gm+m=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 18:13:09 +0200
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Workqueue: add WQ_PERCPU, system_dfl_wq and system_percpu_wq

Hi,

Just a quick question Tejun: when do you expect to receive the other patches?
Should I wait till the next rc1?

I just want to check the work again, but they are ready.

Thanks!


On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 8:54 PM Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 08:14:48AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 03:08:30PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Le Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 08:35:32AM -1000, Tejun Heo a écrit :
> > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 03:35:28PM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> > > > > Marco Crivellari (3):
> > > > >   Workqueue: add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq
> > > > >   Workqueue: add new WQ_PERCPU flag
> > > > >   [Doc] Workqueue: add WQ_PERCPU
> > > >
> > > > Applied 1-3 to wq/for-6.17. I applied as-is but the third patch didn't need
> > > > to be separate. Maybe something to consider for future.
> > >
> > > If this is for the next merge window, I guess the easiest is to wait for it
> > > before sending patches to other subsystems to convert them?
> > >
> > > I guess we could shortcut that with providing a branch that other subsystems
> > > could pull from but that doesn't look convenient...
> >
> > Oh yeah, I said I was gonna do that and promptly forgot. I'll set up a
> > separate branch based on v6.15.
>
> Okay, I folded the doc patch into the second one and applied them to the
> following branch.
>
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git WQ_PERCPU
>
> This is v6.15 + only the two patches and should be easy to pull into any
> devel branch.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun



-- 

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product




marco.crivellari@...e.com