linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/62] KVM: arm64: WARN if unmapping vLPI fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aFXIgrmU8uSA6YHS@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:45:54 -0700
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@....com>,
	Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@....com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
	Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@...il.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/62] KVM: arm64: WARN if unmapping vLPI fails

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 01:31:55PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:04:19PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > If I post it as a standalone patch, could you/Marc put it into a stable topic
> > > branch based on kvm/master? (kvm/master now has patch 1, yay!)  Then I can create
> > > a topic branch for this mountain of stuff based on the arm64 topic branch.
> > 
> > Ok, how about making the arm64 piece patch 1 in your series and you take
> > the whole pile. If we need it, I'll bug you for a ref that only has the
> > first change.
> 
> Any preference as to whether I formally post the last version, or if I apply it
> directly from this thread?

Since I have this email on my phone I'm always in favor of not getting
spammed :) This thread has all the discourse too, so likely a better
artifact.

> > That ok?
> 
> Ya, works for me.  What's the going bribe rate for an ack these days?  :-D

Usually about the cost of a pint ;-) For the arm64 bits:

Acked-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver