lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d44e8b6-ad48-415a-aed6-4c59fcc228b8@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:14:16 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/headers: Document PERF_PMU_CAP capability flags



On 18/06/2025 8:08 pm, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> Over the years, capability flags for perf PMUs were introduced in a
> piecemeal fashion whenever a new driver needed to signal to the perf
> core some limitation or special feature.
> 
> Since one more undocumented flag that can have its meaning inferred from
> the commit message and implementation never seems that bad, it's
> understandable that this resulted in a total of 11 undocumented
> capability flags, which authors of new perf PMU drivers are expected to
> set correctly for their particular device.
> 
> Since I am in the process of becoming such an author of a new perf
> driver, it feels proper to pay it forward by documenting all
> PERF_PMU_CAP_ constants, so that no future person has to go through an
> hour or two of git blame + reading perf core code to figure out which
> capability flags are right for them.
> 
> Add comments in kernel-doc format that describes each flag. This follows
> the somewhat verbose "Object-like macro documentation" format, and can
> be verified with
> 
> 	./scripts/kernel-doc -v -none include/linux/perf_event.h
> 
> The current in-tree kernel documentation does not include a page on the
> perf subsystem, but once it does, these comments should render as proper
> documentation annotation. Until then, they'll also be quite useful for
> anyone looking at the header file.
> 

Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>

> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
> ---
> There may be more perf documentation patches in the future, but right
> now I'm focused on getting a minimally viable driver for the hardware
> I'm working on going. Documenting these seemed to have a fairly good
> effort-to-future-payoff ratio though.
> 
> I Cc'd Corbet in case he has any input on the verbosity of the
> kernel-doc syntax here, maybe I'm missing something and all of these
> could be in a single /* comment */, but as it is in this patch doesn't
> seem too awful to me either.
> ---
>   include/linux/perf_event.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index ec9d96025683958e909bb2463439dc69634f4ceb..7d749fd5225be12543df6e475277563bf16c05b1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -294,16 +294,90 @@ struct perf_event_pmu_context;
>   /**
>    * pmu::capabilities flags
>    */
> +
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT - \
> + *    PMU is incapable of generating hardware interrupts
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT	0x0001
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_NMI - \
> + *    PMU is guaranteed to not generate non-maskable interrupts
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_NMI		0x0002
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG - \
> + *    PMU does not support using scatter-gather as the output
> + *
> + * The PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG flag indicates that the PMU does not support
> + * scatter-gather for its output buffer, and needs a larger contiguous buffer
> + * to output to.
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG		0x0004
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS - \
> + *    PMU is capable of sampling extended registers
> + *
> + * Some architectures have a concept of extended registers, e.g. XMM0 on x86
> + * or VG on arm64. If the PMU is capable of sampling these registers, then the
> + * flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS should be set.
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS	0x0008
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE - \
> + *    PMU can only have one scheduled event at a time
> + *
> + * Certain PMU hardware cannot track several events at the same time. Such
> + * hardware must set PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE in order to avoid conflicts.
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE		0x0010
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_ITRACE - PMU traces instructions
> + *
> + * Some PMU hardware does instruction tracing, in that it traces execution of
> + * each instruction. Setting this capability flag makes the perf core generate
> + * a %PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START event, recording the profiled task's PID and TID,
> + * to allow tools to properly decode such traces.
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_ITRACE		0x0020
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE - \
> + *    PMU is incapable of excluding events based on context
> + *
> + * Some PMU hardware will count events regardless of context, including e.g.
> + * idle, kernel and guest. Drivers for such hardware should set the
> + * PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE flag to explicitly advertise that they're unable to
> + * help themselves, so that the perf core can reject requests to exclude events
> + * based on context.
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE		0x0040
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT - PMU non-AUX events generate AUX data
> + *
> + * Drivers for PMU hardware that supports non-AUX events which generate data for
> + * AUX events should set PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT. This flag tells the perf core
> + * to schedule non-AUX events together with AUX events, so that this data isn't
> + * lost.
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT		0x0080
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE - \
> + *    PMU supports PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE and PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE	0x0100
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PAUSE - \
> + *    PMU can pause and resume AUX area traces based on events
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PAUSE		0x0200
> +/**
> + * define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PREFER_LARGE - PMU prefers contiguous output buffers
> + *
> + * The PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PREFER_LARGE capability flag is a less strict variant of
> + * %PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_NO_SG. PMU drivers for hardware that doesn't strictly
> + * require contiguous output buffers, but find the benefits outweigh the
> + * downside of increased memory fragmentation, may set this capability flag.
> + */
>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PREFER_LARGE	0x0400
>   
>   /**
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 31d56636e10e92ced06ead14b7541867f955e41d
> change-id: 20250618-perf-pmu-cap-docs-a13e4ae939ac
> 
> Best regards,


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ