[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed381bb7-dfc8-4a27-b044-11deb7e75a81@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 15:04:15 +0530
From: Praveen Talari <quic_ptalari@...cinc.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby
<jirislaby@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<psodagud@...cinc.com>, <djaggi@...cinc.com>,
<quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>, <quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com>,
<quic_arandive@...cinc.com>, <quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com>,
<quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/8] serial: qcom-geni: Enable PM runtime for serial
driver
Hi Bjorn,
Thank you for review.
On 6/17/2025 9:23 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 10:51:13PM +0530, Praveen Talari wrote:
>> Add Power Management (PM) runtime support to Qualcomm GENI
>> serial driver.
>>
>
> Doesn't this have impact on the behavior outside of your
> project? Or is the transition from qcom_geni_serial_pm() to explicit
> RPM merely moving code around?
There is no impact on functionality and behavior with this change.
The transition is purely refactor.
Using PM runtime APIs such as
pm_runtime_resume_and_get() and pm_runtime_put_sync() to manage resource
both locally and firmware.
>
> Seems like this deserves to not be hidden in a middle of a patch series.
This depends on refactored patches.
>
>> Introduce necessary callbacks and updates to ensure seamless
>> transitions between power states, enhancing overall power
>> efficiency.
>>
>
> This commit message fails to state why we need runtime PM support in the
> driver.
Sure, will update commit text.
>
> Also, start your commit message with a problem description, per
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
>
>> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Praveen Talari <quic_ptalari@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> v5 -> v6
>> - added reviewed-by tag in commit
>> - added __maybe_unused to PM callback functions to avoid
>> warnings of defined but not used
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
>> index b6fa7dc9b1fb..3691340ce7e8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
>> @@ -1686,10 +1686,10 @@ static void qcom_geni_serial_pm(struct uart_port *uport,
>> old_state = UART_PM_STATE_OFF;
>>
>> if (new_state == UART_PM_STATE_ON && old_state == UART_PM_STATE_OFF)
>> - geni_serial_resources_on(uport);
>> + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(uport->dev);
>> else if (new_state == UART_PM_STATE_OFF &&
>> old_state == UART_PM_STATE_ON)
>> - geni_serial_resources_off(uport);
>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(uport->dev);
>>
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1827,9 +1827,11 @@ static int qcom_geni_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> + pm_runtime_enable(port->se.dev);
>
> Any reason not to use devm_pm_runtime_enable() and avoid the
> two pm_runtime_disable() below?
I agree, will update in next patch-set.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> +
>> ret = uart_add_one_port(drv, uport);
>> if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + goto error;
>>
>> if (port->wakeup_irq > 0) {
>> device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true);
>> @@ -1839,11 +1841,15 @@ static int qcom_geni_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, false);
>> ida_free(&port_ida, uport->line);
>> uart_remove_one_port(drv, uport);
>> - return ret;
>> + goto error;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +error:
>> + pm_runtime_disable(port->se.dev);
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static void qcom_geni_serial_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -1855,9 +1861,26 @@ static void qcom_geni_serial_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&pdev->dev);
>> device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, false);
>> ida_free(&port_ida, uport->line);
>> + pm_runtime_disable(port->se.dev);
>> uart_remove_one_port(drv, &port->uport);
>> }
>>
>> +static int __maybe_unused qcom_geni_serial_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_geni_serial_port *port = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct uart_port *uport = &port->uport;
>> +
>> + return geni_serial_resources_off(uport);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __maybe_unused qcom_geni_serial_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_geni_serial_port *port = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct uart_port *uport = &port->uport;
>> +
>> + return geni_serial_resources_on(uport);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int qcom_geni_serial_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct qcom_geni_serial_port *port = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> @@ -1901,6 +1924,8 @@ static const struct qcom_geni_device_data qcom_geni_uart_data = {
>> };
>>
>> static const struct dev_pm_ops qcom_geni_serial_pm_ops = {
>> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(qcom_geni_serial_runtime_suspend,
>> + qcom_geni_serial_runtime_resume, NULL)
>> SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(qcom_geni_serial_suspend, qcom_geni_serial_resume)
>> };
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists