linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.17 1/2] sched_ext, sched/core: Factor out struct scx_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250620094434.GL1613200@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:44:34 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.17 1/2] sched_ext, sched/core: Factor out
 struct scx_task_group

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 08:21:31AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:50:27AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > How do you want to do this dependency on the bandwidth rework? Should I
> > take those patches into tip/sched/core and then you base your tree on
> > top of that?
> 
> Yes, if you apply these to tip/sched/core, I can pull that into
> sched_ext/for-6.17 and apply the rest.

Done, thanks!