[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250620122630.1113563-1-tuxsogi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 20:26:30 +0800
From: Shou-Chi Chen <tuxsogi@...il.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shou-Chi Chen <tuxsogi@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix typo "a entity" to "an entity" in comment
Corrected a grammatical mistake in the comment of deadline.c,
changing "a entity" to "an entity" to conform with proper English usage.
Signed-off-by: Shou-Chi Chen <tuxsogi@...il.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index ad45a8fea..e1c0a2443 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -848,20 +848,20 @@ static bool dl_entity_overflow(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, u64 t);
/*
* Pure Earliest Deadline First (EDF) scheduling does not deal with the
- * possibility of a entity lasting more than what it declared, and thus
+ * possibility of an entity lasting more than what it declared, and thus
* exhausting its runtime.
*
* Here we are interested in making runtime overrun possible, but we do
- * not want a entity which is misbehaving to affect the scheduling of all
+ * not want an entity which is misbehaving to affect the scheduling of all
* other entities.
* Therefore, a budgeting strategy called Constant Bandwidth Server (CBS)
* is used, in order to confine each entity within its own bandwidth.
*
* This function deals exactly with that, and ensures that when the runtime
- * of a entity is replenished, its deadline is also postponed. That ensures
+ * of an entity is replenished, its deadline is also postponed. That ensures
* the overrunning entity can't interfere with other entity in the system and
* can't make them miss their deadlines. Reasons why this kind of overruns
- * could happen are, typically, a entity voluntarily trying to overcome its
+ * could happen are, typically, an entity voluntarily trying to overcome its
* runtime, or it just underestimated it during sched_setattr().
*/
static void replenish_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
@@ -3104,7 +3104,7 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
if (task_current_donor(rq, p)) {
/*
- * If we now have a earlier deadline task than p,
+ * If we now have an earlier deadline task than p,
* then reschedule, provided p is still on this
* runqueue.
*/
@@ -3123,7 +3123,7 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
}
#else
/*
- * We don't know if p has a earlier or later deadline, so let's blindly
+ * We don't know if p has an earlier or later deadline, so let's blindly
* set a (maybe not needed) rescheduling point.
*/
resched_curr(rq);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists