[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<AM7PR04MB714218CFD852C0C266D515D7967CA@AM7PR04MB7142.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:51:12 +0000
From: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: enetc: separate 64-bit counters from
enetc_port_counters
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 1:22 PM
[...]
> Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: enetc: separate 64-bit counters from
> enetc_port_counters
>
> Some counters in enetc_port_counters are 32-bit registers, and some are 64-
> bit registers. But in the current driver, they are all read through
> enetc_port_rd(), which can only read a 32-bit value. Therefore, separate 64-
> bit counters (enetc_pm_counters) from enetc_port_counters and use
> enetc_port_rd64() to read the 64-bit statistics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists