[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4729217e-9bf5-48c8-9f93-fd33b66c5bcd@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:43:30 +0800
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Nico Pache
<npache@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>, SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/madvise: remove the visitor pattern and thread
anon_vma state
On 2025/6/20 09:32, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 19 Jun 2025, at 16:26, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>
>> Now we have the madvise_behavior helper struct we no longer need to mess
>> around with void* pointers in order to propagate anon_vma_name, and this
>> means we can get rid of the confusing and inconsistent visitor pattern
>> implementation in madvise_vma_anon_name().
>>
>> This means we now have a single state object that threads through most of
>> madvise()'s logic and a single code path which executes the majority of
>> madvise() behaviour (we maintain separate logic for failure injection and
>> memory population for the time being).
>>
>> Note that users cannot inadvertently cause this behaviour to occur, as
>> madvise_behavior_valid() would reject it.
>>
>> Doing this results in a can_modify_vma_madv() check for anonymous VMA name
>> changes, however this will cause no issues as this operation is not
>> prohibited.
>>
>> We can also then reuse more code and drop the redundant
>> madvise_vma_anon_name() function altogether.
>>
>> Additionally separate out behaviours that update VMAs from those that do
>> not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> mm/madvise.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
>> index 070132f9842b..9dd935d64692 100644
>> --- a/mm/madvise.c
>> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
>> #include "internal.h"
>> #include "swap.h"
>>
>> +#define __MADV_SET_ANON_VMA_NAME (-1)
>> +#define __MADV_CLEAR_ANON_VMA_NAME (-2)
>> +
>
> These are stored in madvise_behavior.behavior field and used
> internally. At least you could add a comment in mman-common.h
> about this use, in case someone uses these values for MADV_*.
> Yes, these are large values that are very unlikely to be used,
> but who knows whether one will use them. :)
>
>> /*
>> * Maximum number of attempts we make to install guard pages before we give up
>> * and return -ERESTARTNOINTR to have userspace try again.
>> @@ -59,9 +62,13 @@ struct madvise_behavior {
>> int behavior;
>> struct mmu_gather *tlb;
>> enum madvise_lock_mode lock_mode;
>> + struct anon_vma_name *anon_name;
>> };
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME
>> +static int madvise_walk_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
>> + unsigned long end, struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior);
>> +
>> struct anon_vma_name *anon_vma_name_alloc(const char *name)
>> {
>> struct anon_vma_name *anon_name;
>> @@ -112,6 +119,48 @@ static int replace_anon_vma_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +int madvise_set_anon_name(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
>> + unsigned long len_in, struct anon_vma_name *anon_name)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long end;
>> + unsigned long len;
>> + struct madvise_behavior madv_behavior = {
>> + .lock_mode = MADVISE_MMAP_WRITE_LOCK,
>> + .anon_name = anon_name,
>> + };
>> +
>> + if (start & ~PAGE_MASK)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + len = (len_in + ~PAGE_MASK) & PAGE_MASK;
>> +
>> + /* Check to see whether len was rounded up from small -ve to zero */
>> + if (len_in && !len)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + end = start + len;
>> + if (end < start)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (end == start)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + madv_behavior.behavior =
>> + anon_name ? __MADV_SET_ANON_VMA_NAME : __MADV_CLEAR_ANON_VMA_NAME;
>
> How are __MADV_SET_ANON_VMA_NAME and __MADV_CLEAR_ANON_VMA_NAME used?
> It seems to me that madvise_vma_behavior() treats them the same.
> Why does anon_name is NULL or not make a difference?
>
>> +
>> + return madvise_walk_vmas(mm, start, end, &madv_behavior);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool is_anon_vma_name(int behavior)
>
> Maybe update_anon_vma_name()? Otherwise the function reads like
> the behavior can be anon_vma_name.
>
>> +{
>> + switch (behavior) {
>> + case __MADV_SET_ANON_VMA_NAME:
>> + case __MADV_CLEAR_ANON_VMA_NAME:
>> + return true;
>> + default:
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +}
>> #else /* CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME */
>> static int replace_anon_vma_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> struct anon_vma_name *anon_name)
>> @@ -121,6 +170,11 @@ static int replace_anon_vma_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +static bool is_anon_vma_name(int behavior)
>> +{
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> #endif /* CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME */
>> /*
>> * Update the vm_flags on region of a vma, splitting it or merging it as
>> @@ -1252,13 +1306,12 @@ static long madvise_guard_remove(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> static int madvise_vma_behavior(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> struct vm_area_struct **prev,
>> unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>> - void *behavior_arg)
>> + struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior)
>> {
>> - struct madvise_behavior *arg = behavior_arg;
>> - int behavior = arg->behavior;
>> - int error;
>> - struct anon_vma_name *anon_name;
>> + int behavior = madv_behavior->behavior;
>> + struct anon_vma_name *anon_name = madv_behavior->anon_name;
>> vm_flags_t new_flags = vma->vm_flags;
>> + int error;
>>
>> if (unlikely(!can_modify_vma_madv(vma, behavior)))
>> return -EPERM;
>> @@ -1275,7 +1328,17 @@ static int madvise_vma_behavior(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> case MADV_FREE:
>> case MADV_DONTNEED:
>> case MADV_DONTNEED_LOCKED:
>> - return madvise_dontneed_free(vma, prev, start, end, arg);
>> + return madvise_dontneed_free(vma, prev, start, end,
>> + madv_behavior);
>> + case MADV_COLLAPSE:
>> + return madvise_collapse(vma, prev, start, end);
>> + case MADV_GUARD_INSTALL:
>> + return madvise_guard_install(vma, prev, start, end);
>> + case MADV_GUARD_REMOVE:
>> + return madvise_guard_remove(vma, prev, start, end);
>> +
>> + /* The below behaviours update VMAs via madvise_update_vma(). */
>> +
>
> Great comment and code move!
>
>> case MADV_NORMAL:
>> new_flags = new_flags & ~VM_RAND_READ & ~VM_SEQ_READ;
>> break;
>> @@ -1325,21 +1388,25 @@ static int madvise_vma_behavior(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> if (error)
>> goto out;
>> break;
>> - case MADV_COLLAPSE:
>> - return madvise_collapse(vma, prev, start, end);
>> - case MADV_GUARD_INSTALL:
>> - return madvise_guard_install(vma, prev, start, end);
>> - case MADV_GUARD_REMOVE:
>> - return madvise_guard_remove(vma, prev, start, end);
>> + case __MADV_SET_ANON_VMA_NAME:
>> + case __MADV_CLEAR_ANON_VMA_NAME:
Would this be clearer and more closely describe the code's logic?
/* Reject naming for regular file-backed mappings. */
>> + /* Only anonymous mappings can be named */
>> + if (vma->vm_file && !vma_is_anon_shmem(vma))
>> + return -EBADF;
>> + break;
>> }
Thanks,
Lance
>
> __MADV_SET_ANON_VMA_NAME and __MADV_CLEAR_ANON_VMA_NAME are
> used here the code below. I do not see the functional difference
> of them. I understand a NULL anon_name means clear the name,
> but it is also just set the name to NULL.
>
>>
>> /* We cannot provide prev in this lock mode. */
>> - VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(arg->lock_mode == MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK);
>> - anon_name = anon_vma_name(vma);
>> - anon_vma_name_get(anon_name);
>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(madv_behavior->lock_mode == MADVISE_VMA_READ_LOCK);
>> +
>> + if (!is_anon_vma_name(behavior)) {
>> + anon_name = anon_vma_name(vma);
>> + anon_vma_name_get(anon_name);
>> + }
>> error = madvise_update_vma(vma, prev, start, end, new_flags,
>> anon_name);
>> - anon_vma_name_put(anon_name);
>> + if (!is_anon_vma_name(behavior))
>> + anon_vma_name_put(anon_name);
>
> Otherwise, the rest looks good to me.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Yan, Zi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists