[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8126de92-0338-4cd0-98fc-4f8c37500201@riscstar.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 09:10:35 -0500
From: Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, dlan@...too.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
alex@...ti.fr, troymitchell988@...il.com, guodong@...cstar.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
spacemit@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mfd: spacemit: add support for SpacemiT PMICs
On 6/19/25 9:40 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2025, Alex Elder wrote:
>
>> Add support for SpacemiT PMICs. Initially only the P1 PMIC is supported
>> but the driver is structured to allow support for others to be added.
>>
>> The P1 PMIC is controlled by I2C, and is normally implemented with the
>> SpacemiT K1 SoC. This PMIC provides six buck converters and 12 LDO
>
> six or 12. Please pick a format and remain consistent.
"Numbers smaller than ten should be spelled out."
But I'll use 6 and 12.
>> regulators. It also implements a switch, watchdog timer, real-time clock,
>> and more, but initially we will only support its regulators.
>
> You have to provide support for more than one device for this to be
> accepted into MFD.
OK. I'm looking at the other device functions to see if I
can pick the easiest one.
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 11 +++++
>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/mfd/spacemit-pmic.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/spacemit-pmic.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
>> index 6fb3768e3d71c..c59ae6cc2dd8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
>> @@ -1182,6 +1182,17 @@ config MFD_QCOM_RPM
>> Say M here if you want to include support for the Qualcomm RPM as a
>> module. This will build a module called "qcom_rpm".
>>
>> +config MFD_SPACEMIT_PMIC
>> + tristate "SpacemiT PMIC"
>> + depends on ARCH_SPACEMIT || COMPILE_TEST
>> + depends on I2C && OF
>> + select MFD_CORE
>> + select REGMAP_I2C
>> + default ARCH_SPACEMIT
>> + help
>> + This option enables support for SpacemiT I2C based PMICs. At
>> + this time only the P1 PMIC (used with the K1 SoC) is supported.
>> +
>> config MFD_SPMI_PMIC
>> tristate "Qualcomm SPMI PMICs"
>> depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
>> index 79495f9f3457b..59d1ec8db3a3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
>> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SUN4I_GPADC) += sun4i-gpadc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_STM32_LPTIMER) += stm32-lptimer.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_STM32_TIMERS) += stm32-timers.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MXS_LRADC) += mxs-lradc.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SPACEMIT_PMIC) += spacemit-pmic.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SC27XX_PMIC) += sprd-sc27xx-spi.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_RAVE_SP_CORE) += rave-sp.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD71828) += rohm-bd71828.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/spacemit-pmic.c b/drivers/mfd/spacemit-pmic.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000..7c3c3e27236da
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/spacemit-pmic.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2025 by RISCstar Solutions Corporation. All rights reserved.
>> + * Derived from code from:
>> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Troy Mitchell <troymitchell988@...il.com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +struct spacemit_pmic_data {
>
> s/data/ddata/
I hadn't noticed that convention. I'll use it.
>> + const struct regmap_config *regmap_config;
>> + const struct mfd_cell *mfd_cells; /* array */
>
> Hmm ... this is a red flag. Let's see.
>
>> + size_t mfd_cell_count;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct regmap_config p1_regmap_config = {
>> + .reg_bits = 8,
>> + .val_bits = 8,
>> + .max_register = 0xaa,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* The name field defines the *driver* name that should bind to the device */
>
> This comment is superfluous.
I'll delete it.
I was expecting the driver to recognize the device, not
the device specifying what driver to use, but I guess
I'm used to the DT model.
>> +static const struct mfd_cell p1_cells[] = {
>> + {
>> + .name = "spacemit-p1-regulator",
>
> This spacing is wonky. Take a look at all the other drivers here.
>
> Also, you probably want to use MFD_CELL_NAME().
Yes, I see that does what I want.
> One is not enough.
>
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct spacemit_pmic_data p1_pmic_data = {
>> + .regmap_config = &p1_regmap_config,
>> + .mfd_cells = p1_cells,
>> + .mfd_cell_count = ARRAY_SIZE(p1_cells),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int spacemit_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> + const struct spacemit_pmic_data *data;
>> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>> +
>> + /* We currently have no need for a device-specific structure */
>
> Then why are we adding one?
I don't understand, but it might be moot once I add support
for another (sub)device.
>> + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>> + regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, data->regmap_config);
>> + if (IS_ERR(regmap))
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(regmap),
>> + "regmap initialization failed");
>> +
>> + return devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
>> + data->mfd_cells, data->mfd_cell_count,
>> + NULL, 0, NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id spacemit_pmic_match[] = {
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "spacemit,p1",
>> + .data = &p1_pmic_data,
>
> Ah, now I see.
>
> We do not allow one data from registration mechanism (MFD) to be piped
> through another (OF). If you have to match platform data to device (you
> don't), then pass through identifiers and match on those in a switch()
> statement instead.
I haven't done an MFD driver before and it took some time
to get this working. I'll tell you what led me to it.
I used code posted by Troy Mitchell (plus downstream) as a
starting point.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241230-k1-p1-v1-0-aa4e02b9f993@gmail.com/
Krzysztof Kozlowski made this comment on Troy's DT binding:
Drop compatible, regulators are not re-usable blocks.
So my goal was to have the PMIC regulators get bound to a
driver without specifying a DT compatible string, and I
found this worked.
You say I don't need to match platform data to device, but
if I did I would pass through identifiers. Can you refer
me to an example of code that correctly does what I should
be doing instead?
One other comment/question:
This driver is structured as if it could support a different
PMIC (in addition to P1). Should I *not* do that, and simply
make a source file hard-coded for this one PMIC?
>> + },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, spacemit_pmic_match);
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_driver spacemit_pmic_i2c_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "spacemit-pmic",
>> + .of_match_table = spacemit_pmic_match,
>> + },
>> + .probe = spacemit_pmic_probe,
>
> Remove these odd tabs please.
OK.
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init spacemit_pmic_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return i2c_add_driver(&spacemit_pmic_i2c_driver);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit spacemit_pmic_exit(void)
>> +{
>> + i2c_del_driver(&spacemit_pmic_i2c_driver);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Remove this line.
Sure.
>> +module_init(spacemit_pmic_init);
>> +module_exit(spacemit_pmic_exit);
>
> Are you sure there isn't some boiler plate to do all of this?
>
> Ah ha:
>
> module_i2c_driver()
Thanks for Googling that for me. And thank you very much
for the review.
-Alex
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SpacemiT multi-function PMIC driver");
>> --
>> 2.45.2
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists