[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bac9f6-1646-4a5f-84f7-1dd127717dbc@t-8ch.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:36:01 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: fix spelling of FD_SETBITMASK in FD_*
macros
On 2025-06-21 10:21:34+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 10:19:52AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On 2025-06-20 10:33:25+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > While nolibc-test does test syscalls, it doesn't test as much the rest
> > > of the macros, and a wrong spelling of FD_SETBITMASK in commit
> > > feaf75658783a broke programs using either FD_SET() or FD_CLR() without
> > > being noticed. Let's fix these macros.
> > >
> > > Fixes: feaf75658783a ("nolibc: fix fd_set type")
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v6.2+
> > > Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
> >
> > Acked-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
> >
> > Let me know if I should apply it.
>
> As you prefer, given that you already have other ones in flight, maybe
> you want to order them as desired. Otherwise I'll push it.
Then feel free to push it.
I have nothing going on right now.
Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists