[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250621122059.6caf299a@pumpkin>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 12:20:59 +0100
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>,
Xianglai Li <lixianglai@...ngson.cn>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] LoongArch: KVM: INTC: Add address alignment
check
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:47:22 +0800
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi, Bibo,
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 9:51 AM Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> >
> > IOCSR instruction supports 1/2/4/8 bytes access, the address should
> > be naturally aligned with its access size. Here address alignment
> > check is added in eiointc kernel emulation.
> >
> > At the same time len must be 1/2/4/8 bytes from iocsr exit emulation
> > function kvm_emu_iocsr(), remove the default case in switch case
> > statements.
> Robust code doesn't depend its callers do things right, so I suggest
> keeping the default case, which means we just add the alignment check
> here.
kernel code generally relies on callers to DTRT - except for values
that come from userspace.
Otherwise you get unreadable and slow code that continuously checks
for things that can't happen.
David
>
> And I think this patch should also Cc stable and add a Fixes tag.
>
>
> Huacai
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
> > ---
> > arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/eiointc.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/eiointc.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/eiointc.c
> > index 8b0d9376eb54..4e9d12300cc4 100644
> > --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/eiointc.c
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/eiointc.c
> > @@ -311,6 +311,12 @@ static int kvm_eiointc_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + /* len must be 1/2/4/8 from function kvm_emu_iocsr() */
> > + if (addr & (len - 1)) {
> > + kvm_err("%s: eiointc not aligned addr %llx len %d\n", __func__, addr, len);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > vcpu->stat.eiointc_read_exits++;
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&eiointc->lock, flags);
> > switch (len) {
> > @@ -323,12 +329,9 @@ static int kvm_eiointc_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > case 4:
> > ret = loongarch_eiointc_readl(vcpu, eiointc, addr, val);
> > break;
> > - case 8:
> > + default:
> > ret = loongarch_eiointc_readq(vcpu, eiointc, addr, val);
> > break;
> > - default:
> > - WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: Abnormal address access: addr 0x%llx, size %d\n",
> > - __func__, addr, len);
> > }
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&eiointc->lock, flags);
> >
> > @@ -682,6 +685,11 @@ static int kvm_eiointc_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + if (addr & (len - 1)) {
> > + kvm_err("%s: eiointc not aligned addr %llx len %d\n", __func__, addr, len);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > vcpu->stat.eiointc_write_exits++;
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&eiointc->lock, flags);
> > switch (len) {
> > @@ -694,12 +702,9 @@ static int kvm_eiointc_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > case 4:
> > ret = loongarch_eiointc_writel(vcpu, eiointc, addr, val);
> > break;
> > - case 8:
> > + default:
> > ret = loongarch_eiointc_writeq(vcpu, eiointc, addr, val);
> > break;
> > - default:
> > - WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: Abnormal address access: addr 0x%llx, size %d\n",
> > - __func__, addr, len);
> > }
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&eiointc->lock, flags);
> >
> > --
> > 2.39.3
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists