[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFaYbqRRV2l7nPcr@geday>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 08:33:02 -0300
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@...il.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rick wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@...il.com>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] PCI: rockchip: Improve driver quality
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 09:39:08AM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Geraldo,
>
> Am Samstag, 21. Juni 2025, 03:47:51 MitteleuropÀische Sommerzeit schrieb Geraldo Nascimento:
> > During a 30-day debugging-run fighting quirky PCIe devices on RK3399
> > some quality improvements began to take form and this is my attempt
> > at upstreaming it. It will ensure maximum chance of retraining to Gen2
> > 5.0GT/s, on all four lanes and fix async strobe TEST_WRITE disablement.
>
> just a driver by comment, you might want to drop the RFC element from
> the patch subjects.
>
> It does look like things take form nicely and how people read those
> RFC marks varies wildly. Some may even read it as "this is unfinished"
> or something and spent review time on other things.
>
> So if you're mostly happy with your changes, just drop the RFC part :-)
>
Hi Heiko,
thanks for heads-up, we really don't want people to ignore patches so
I'll drop RFC tag for next iteration. The cover letter needs some love
too.
Thanks,
Geraldo Nascimento
Powered by blists - more mailing lists