[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250621123753.2009f05b.gary@garyguo.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 12:37:53 +0100
From: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
lkmm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda
<ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin
<lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl
<aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich
<dakr@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Wedson Almeida
Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Lyude
Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mitchell Levy
<levymitchell0@...il.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, "Greg
Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] rust: sync: atomic: Add atomic {cmp,}xchg
operations
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:49:29 -0700
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
> xchg() and cmpxchg() are basic operations on atomic. Provide these based
> on C APIs.
>
> Note that cmpxchg() use the similar function signature as
> compare_exchange() in Rust std: returning a `Result`, `Ok(old)` means
> the operation succeeds and `Err(old)` means the operation fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> ---
> rust/kernel/sync/atomic/generic.rs | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 154 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/generic.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/generic.rs
> index 73c26f9cf6b8..bcdbeea45dd8 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/generic.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/sync/atomic/generic.rs
> @@ -256,3 +256,157 @@ pub fn store<Ordering: ReleaseOrRelaxed>(&self, v: T, _: Ordering) {
> };
> }
> }
> +
> +impl<T: AllowAtomic> Atomic<T>
> +where
> + T::Repr: AtomicHasXchgOps,
> +{
> + /// Atomic exchange.
> + ///
> + /// # Examples
> + ///
> + /// ```rust
> + /// use kernel::sync::atomic::{Atomic, Acquire, Relaxed};
> + ///
> + /// let x = Atomic::new(42);
> + ///
> + /// assert_eq!(42, x.xchg(52, Acquire));
> + /// assert_eq!(52, x.load(Relaxed));
> + /// ```
> + #[doc(alias("atomic_xchg", "atomic64_xchg"))]
> + #[inline(always)]
> + pub fn xchg<Ordering: All>(&self, v: T, _: Ordering) -> T {
> + let v = T::into_repr(v);
> + let a = self.as_ptr().cast::<T::Repr>();
> +
> + // SAFETY:
> + // - For calling the atomic_xchg*() function:
> + // - `self.as_ptr()` is a valid pointer, and per the safety requirement of `AllocAtomic`,
> + // a `*mut T` is a valid `*mut T::Repr`. Therefore `a` is a valid pointer,
> + // - per the type invariants, the following atomic operation won't cause data races.
> + // - For extra safety requirement of usage on pointers returned by `self.as_ptr():
> + // - atomic operations are used here.
> + let ret = unsafe {
> + match Ordering::TYPE {
> + OrderingType::Full => T::Repr::atomic_xchg(a, v),
> + OrderingType::Acquire => T::Repr::atomic_xchg_acquire(a, v),
> + OrderingType::Release => T::Repr::atomic_xchg_release(a, v),
> + OrderingType::Relaxed => T::Repr::atomic_xchg_relaxed(a, v),
> + }
> + };
> +
> + T::from_repr(ret)
> + }
> +
> + /// Atomic compare and exchange.
> + ///
> + /// Compare: The comparison is done via the byte level comparison between the atomic variables
> + /// with the `old` value.
> + ///
> + /// Ordering: When succeeds, provides the corresponding ordering as the `Ordering` type
> + /// parameter indicates, and a failed one doesn't provide any ordering, the read part of a
> + /// failed cmpxchg should be treated as a relaxed read.
> + ///
> + /// Returns `Ok(value)` if cmpxchg succeeds, and `value` is guaranteed to be equal to `old`,
> + /// otherwise returns `Err(value)`, and `value` is the value of the atomic variable when
> + /// cmpxchg was happening.
> + ///
> + /// # Examples
> + ///
> + /// ```rust
> + /// use kernel::sync::atomic::{Atomic, Full, Relaxed};
> + ///
> + /// let x = Atomic::new(42);
> + ///
> + /// // Checks whether cmpxchg succeeded.
> + /// let success = x.cmpxchg(52, 64, Relaxed).is_ok();
> + /// # assert!(!success);
> + ///
> + /// // Checks whether cmpxchg failed.
> + /// let failure = x.cmpxchg(52, 64, Relaxed).is_err();
> + /// # assert!(failure);
> + ///
> + /// // Uses the old value if failed, probably re-try cmpxchg.
> + /// match x.cmpxchg(52, 64, Relaxed) {
> + /// Ok(_) => { },
> + /// Err(old) => {
> + /// // do something with `old`.
> + /// # assert_eq!(old, 42);
> + /// }
> + /// }
> + ///
> + /// // Uses the latest value regardlessly, same as atomic_cmpxchg() in C.
> + /// let latest = x.cmpxchg(42, 64, Full).unwrap_or_else(|old| old);
> + /// # assert_eq!(42, latest);
> + /// assert_eq!(64, x.load(Relaxed));
> + /// ```
> + #[doc(alias(
> + "atomic_cmpxchg",
> + "atomic64_cmpxchg",
> + "atomic_try_cmpxchg",
> + "atomic64_try_cmpxchg"
> + ))]
> + #[inline(always)]
> + pub fn cmpxchg<Ordering: All>(&self, mut old: T, new: T, o: Ordering) -> Result<T, T> {
> + // Note on code generation:
> + //
> + // try_cmpxchg() is used to implement cmpxchg(), and if the helper functions are inlined,
> + // the compiler is able to figure out that branch is not needed if the users don't care
> + // about whether the operation succeeds or not. One exception is on x86, due to commit
> + // 44fe84459faf ("locking/atomic: Fix atomic_try_cmpxchg() semantics"), the
> + // atomic_try_cmpxchg() on x86 has a branch even if the caller doesn't care about the
> + // success of cmpxchg and only wants to use the old value. For example, for code like:
> + //
> + // let latest = x.cmpxchg(42, 64, Full).unwrap_or_else(|old| old);
> + //
> + // It will still generate code:
> + //
> + // movl $0x40, %ecx
> + // movl $0x34, %eax
> + // lock
> + // cmpxchgl %ecx, 0x4(%rsp)
> + // jne 1f
> + // 2:
> + // ...
> + // 1: movl %eax, %ecx
> + // jmp 2b
> + //
> + // This might be "fixed" by introducing a try_cmpxchg_exclusive() that knows the "*old"
> + // location in the C function is always safe to write.
> + if self.try_cmpxchg(&mut old, new, o) {
> + Ok(old)
> + } else {
> + Err(old)
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /// Atomic compare and exchange and returns whether the operation succeeds.
> + ///
> + /// "Compare" and "Ordering" part are the same as [`Atomic::cmpxchg()`].
> + ///
> + /// Returns `true` means the cmpxchg succeeds otherwise returns `false` with `old` updated to
> + /// the value of the atomic variable when cmpxchg was happening.
> + #[inline(always)]
> + fn try_cmpxchg<Ordering: All>(&self, old: &mut T, new: T, _: Ordering) -> bool {
> + let old = (old as *mut T).cast::<T::Repr>();
> + let new = T::into_repr(new);
> + let a = self.0.get().cast::<T::Repr>();
> +
> + // SAFETY:
> + // - For calling the atomic_try_cmpchg*() function:
> + // - `self.as_ptr()` is a valid pointer, and per the safety requirement of `AllowAtomic`,
> + // a `*mut T` is a valid `*mut T::Repr`. Therefore `a` is a valid pointer,
> + // - per the type invariants, the following atomic operation won't cause data races.
> + // - `old` is a valid pointer to write because it comes from a mutable reference.
> + // - For extra safety requirement of usage on pointers returned by `self.as_ptr():
> + // - atomic operations are used here.
> + unsafe {
> + match Ordering::TYPE {
> + OrderingType::Full => T::Repr::atomic_try_cmpxchg(a, old, new),
> + OrderingType::Acquire => T::Repr::atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(a, old, new),
> + OrderingType::Release => T::Repr::atomic_try_cmpxchg_release(a, old, new),
> + OrderingType::Relaxed => T::Repr::atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(a, old, new),
> + }
> + }
Again this function is only using `T::into_repr`, bypassing
`T::from_repr` and just use pointer casting.
BTW, any reason that this is a separate function, and it couldn't just
be in `cmpxchg` function?
> + }
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists