[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b203b067e369411b029039f96cfeae300874b4c7.1750470187.git.geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 22:48:45 -0300
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@...il.com>
To: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rick wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@...il.com>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 3/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Enable all four lanes if
required
Current code enables only Lane 0 because pwr_cnt will be incremented on
first call to the function. Let's reorder the enablement code to enable
all 4 lanes through GRF.
Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@...il.com>
---
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index bd44af36c67a..f22ffb41cdc2 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
@@ -160,6 +160,12 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
+ rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
+ HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
+ PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
+ PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
+
if (rk_phy->pwr_cnt++) {
return 0;
}
@@ -176,12 +182,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK,
PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT));
- regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
- rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
- HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
- PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
- PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
-
/*
* No documented timeout value for phy operation below,
* so we make it large enough here. And we use loop-break
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists