[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <369459745a8f8e43f80c47bae554829dad8f635c.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 14:46:58 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@...il.com>, Chuck Lever
<chuck.lever@...cle.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, NeilBrown
<neil@...wn.name>, Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@...hat.com>, Dai Ngo
<Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Konstantin
Evtushenko <koevtushenko@...dex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] nfsd: Drop dprintk in blocklayout xdr functions
On Sat, 2025-06-21 at 19:52 +0300, Sergey Bashirov wrote:
> Minor clean up. Instead of dprintk there are appropriate error codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.c | 40 +++++++---------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.c b/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.c
> index 669ff8e6e966..bcf21fde9120 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/blocklayoutxdr.c
> @@ -139,28 +139,19 @@ nfsd4_block_decode_layoutupdate(__be32 *p, u32 len, struct iomap **iomapp,
> struct iomap *iomaps;
> u32 nr_iomaps, i;
>
> - if (len < sizeof(u32)) {
> - dprintk("%s: extent array too small: %u\n", __func__, len);
> + if (len < sizeof(u32))
> return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> - }
> len -= sizeof(u32);
> - if (len % PNFS_BLOCK_EXTENT_SIZE) {
> - dprintk("%s: extent array invalid: %u\n", __func__, len);
> + if (len % PNFS_BLOCK_EXTENT_SIZE)
> return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> - }
>
> nr_iomaps = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> - if (nr_iomaps != len / PNFS_BLOCK_EXTENT_SIZE) {
> - dprintk("%s: extent array size mismatch: %u/%u\n",
> - __func__, len, nr_iomaps);
> + if (nr_iomaps != len / PNFS_BLOCK_EXTENT_SIZE)
> return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> - }
>
> iomaps = kcalloc(nr_iomaps, sizeof(*iomaps), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!iomaps) {
> - dprintk("%s: failed to allocate extent array\n", __func__);
> + if (!iomaps)
> return nfserr_delay;
> - }
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_iomaps; i++) {
> struct pnfs_block_extent bex;
> @@ -170,26 +161,18 @@ nfsd4_block_decode_layoutupdate(__be32 *p, u32 len, struct iomap **iomapp,
>
> p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &bex.foff);
> if (bex.foff & (block_size - 1)) {
> - dprintk("%s: unaligned offset 0x%llx\n",
> - __func__, bex.foff);
> goto fail;
> }
> p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &bex.len);
> if (bex.len & (block_size - 1)) {
> - dprintk("%s: unaligned length 0x%llx\n",
> - __func__, bex.foff);
> goto fail;
> }
> p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &bex.soff);
> if (bex.soff & (block_size - 1)) {
> - dprintk("%s: unaligned disk offset 0x%llx\n",
> - __func__, bex.soff);
> goto fail;
> }
> bex.es = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> if (bex.es != PNFS_BLOCK_READWRITE_DATA) {
> - dprintk("%s: incorrect extent state %d\n",
> - __func__, bex.es);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -231,38 +214,29 @@ nfsd4_scsi_decode_layoutupdate(__be32 *p, u32 len, struct iomap **iomapp,
> struct iomap *iomaps;
> u32 nr_iomaps, expected, i;
>
> - if (len < sizeof(u32)) {
> - dprintk("%s: extent array too small: %u\n", __func__, len);
> + if (len < sizeof(u32))
> return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> - }
>
> nr_iomaps = be32_to_cpup(p++);
> expected = sizeof(__be32) + nr_iomaps * PNFS_SCSI_RANGE_SIZE;
> - if (len != expected) {
> - dprintk("%s: extent array size mismatch: %u/%u\n",
> - __func__, len, expected);
> + if (len != expected)
> return nfserr_bad_xdr;
> - }
>
> iomaps = kcalloc(nr_iomaps, sizeof(*iomaps), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!iomaps) {
> - dprintk("%s: failed to allocate extent array\n", __func__);
> + if (!iomaps)
> return nfserr_delay;
> - }
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_iomaps; i++) {
> u64 val;
>
> p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &val);
> if (val & (block_size - 1)) {
> - dprintk("%s: unaligned offset 0x%llx\n", __func__, val);
> goto fail;
> }
> iomaps[i].offset = val;
>
> p = xdr_decode_hyper(p, &val);
> if (val & (block_size - 1)) {
> - dprintk("%s: unaligned length 0x%llx\n", __func__, val);
> goto fail;
> }
> iomaps[i].length = val;
Looks sane, and most of these dprintks aren't terribly helpful for day
to day usage.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists