linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv6 01/16] x86/cpu: Enumerate the LASS feature bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f04936b7-e1e1-4a63-a907-33315af0dd8f@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:50:19 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf
 <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@...driver.com>,
        Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>, "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
        Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
        Rick Edgecombe
 <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
        Huang Shijie <shijie@...amperecomputing.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Yian Chen <yian.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 01/16] x86/cpu: Enumerate the LASS feature bits

On 2025-06-20 17:45, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> But I simply hate adding a disabled feature that depends on !X86_64;
>> x86_64 has a broad scope, and new CPU features are often intentionally
>> not enabled for 32-bit.
>>
>> (X86_DISABLED_FEATURE_PCID is the only one before LASS)
> 
> More importantly, it is wrong.
> 
> The 32-bit build can depend on this feature not existing, therefore it SHOULD be listed as a disabled feature.
> 

Ok, that was word salad. What I meant was that the original patch is 
correct, and we SHOULD have this as a disabled feature.

The reason is that it reduces the need to explicitly test for 32/64 bits 
for features that don't exist on 32 bits. When they are flagged as 
disabled, they get filtered out *at compile time*.

	-hpa