lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <011093f8-85a1-4c3c-b3fa-7be9e6df8a25@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 11:43:11 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Darren.Ye" <darren.ye@...iatek.com>, Liam Girdwood
 <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger
 <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] ASoC: dt-bindings: mediatek,mt8196-afe: add
 support for MT8196 audio AFE controller

On 20/06/2025 11:40, Darren.Ye wrote:
> From: Darren Ye <darren.ye@...iatek.com>
> 
> This patch adds initial support for the audio AFE(Audio Front End) controller

Why this was changed to undesired 'This patch' (see submitting patches)?
I think you are circling back to previous versions, reintroducing issues
fixed in between.

> on the mediatek MT8196 platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darren Ye <darren.ye@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>


Subject: I asked to drop document, because the rest was correct and you
totally rewritten it to unnecessary too long subject.

Well, at least the rest you implemented, but I just don't get why, when
asked to change something you change several things to less desired style.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ