[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af90121a-37e3-488f-aa28-fac0d1c69c09@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 12:28:01 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, mirela.rabulea@....com, mchehab@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ming.qian@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] media: dt-bindings: nxp,imx8-jpeg: Add
compatible strings for IMX95 JPEG
On 20/06/2025 17:06, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Le vendredi 20 juin 2025 à 07:54 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>> On 19/06/2025 19:16, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>>> Le jeudi 19 juin 2025 à 12:27 +0800, Shawn Guo a écrit :
>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 07:22:04PM -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Le mercredi 21 mai 2025 à 13:34 -0400, Frank Li a écrit :
>>>>>> Add compatible strings "nxp,imx95-jpgdec" and "nxp,imx95-jpgenc", which
>>>>>> are backward compatible with "nxp,imx8qxp-jpgdec" and
>>>>>> "nxp,imx8qxp-jpegenc". i.MX95 just need one power domain which combine
>>>>>> wrap and all slots together. Reduce minItems of power-domains to 1 for
>>>>>> i.MX95 and keep the same restriction for others.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Krzysztof, will you take this one once the DTS part is ready ?
>>>>
>>>> dt-bindings is the prerequisite of DTS. DTS patch looks good to me
>>>> and I'm waiting for dt-bindings part to be applied first.
>>>
>>> I was waiting for sign of life on the DTS part, we usually get some ack,
>>> which is good sign we can take the bindings.
>>
>> Such process never happens. DT bindings are the prerequisite here and
>> platform maintainers wait for bindings to be accepted before taking DTS
>> or even sometimes reviewing DTS. Why even bother to review DTS if it
>> follows entirely incorrect binding?
>
> You are the one requesting DTS with DT bindings for review purpose. You've
> done so regularly this year.
Yes, I asked for DTS for before/while reviewing very questionable
bindings and drivers. Was this reviewed already? Yes, it was. Therefore
after my review, how is this relevant?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists