[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250622123752.1834fbe2@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 12:37:52 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
Cc: dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, lucas.p.stankus@...il.com, lars@...afoo.de,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, bagasdotme@...il.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] iio: accel: adxl313: add AC coupled
activity/inactivity events
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 22:22:57 +0000
Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com> wrote:
> Introduce AC-coupled activity and inactivity as MAG_ADAPTIVE events.
> This adds a new set of threshold and duration configuration options,
> ensures proper handling of event disabling, and extends the use of the
> link bit to support complementary event configurations.
>
> For example, either ACTIVITY or ACTIVITY_AC can be enabled, but only the
> most recently set configuration will remain active. Disabling ACTIVITY
> will have no effect if ACTIVITY_AC is currently enabled, as the event
> types must match (i.e., ACTIVITY_AC must be explicitly disabled). When
> either INACTIVITY or INACTIVITY_AC is enabled alongside an activity
> event, the link bit is set.
>
> With the link bit and auto-sleep enabled, activity and inactivity events
> represent changes in the sensor's power-saving state and are only
> triggered upon actual state transitions. Since AC coupling uses separate
> bits for activity and inactivity, each can be configured independently.
> For instance, ACTIVITY can be linked with INACTIVITY_AC.
>
> If one of the linked events is disabled, the link bit is cleared. In
> that case, the remaining event will no longer reflect a state transition
> but will instead trigger based on periodic inactivity or whenever the
> activity threshold is exceeded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
One small suggestion below.
>
> static int adxl313_set_act_inact_linkbit(struct adxl313_data *data, bool en)
> {
> - int act_en, inact_en;
> + int act_en, inact_en, act_ac_en, inact_ac_en;
>
> act_en = adxl313_is_act_inact_en(data, ADXL313_ACTIVITY);
> if (act_en < 0)
> return act_en;
>
> + act_ac_en = adxl313_is_act_inact_en(data, ADXL313_ACTIVITY_AC);
> + if (act_ac_en < 0)
> + return act_ac_en;
> +
> + act_en = act_en || act_ac_en;
All ends up a little confusing as act_en changes meaning as it is built
up. Maybe better to just have act_dc_en in earlier patch then so
the boolean complexity all in one place?...
> +
> inact_en = adxl313_is_act_inact_en(data, ADXL313_INACTIVITY);
> if (inact_en < 0)
> return inact_en;
>
> + inact_ac_en = adxl313_is_act_inact_en(data, ADXL313_INACTIVITY_AC);
> + if (inact_ac_en < 0)
> + return inact_ac_en;
> +
> + inact_en = inact_en || inact_ac_en;
> +
> en = en && act_en && inact_en;
en = en && (act_dc_en || act_ac_en) && (inact_dc_en || inact_ac_en);
>
> return regmap_assign_bits(data->regmap, ADXL313_REG_POWER_CTL,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists