linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v12 01/10] virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOEp5OcybMttzRam+RKQHv4KA-zLnxGrL+UApc5KrAG+op9LKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 20:40:02 +0300
From: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, 
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@...nix.com>, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, gur.stavi@...wei.com, 
	Lei Yang <leiyang@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 01/10] virtio_net: Add functions for hashing

> Yuri, can you help to clarify this?

I see here several questions:
1. Whether it is ok for the device not to indicate support for XXX_EX hash type?
- I think, yes (strictly speaking, it was better to test that before
submitting the patches )
2. Is it possible that the guest will enable some XXX_EX hash type if
the device does not indicate that it is supported?
- No (I think this is part of the spec)
3. What to do if we migrate between systems with different
capabilities of hash support/reporting/whatever
- IMO, at this moment such case should be excluded and only mechanism
we have for that is the compatible machine version
- in some future the change of device capabilities can be communicated
to the driver and _probably_ the driver might be able to communicate
the change of device capabilities to the OS
4. Does it make sense to have fine configuration of hash types mask
via command-line?
- IMO, no. This would require the user to have too much knowledge
about RSS internals

Please let me know if I missed something.