[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07f5fdb4-2c5c-4723-b12a-abdb0c9f33b7@t-8ch.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 21:58:52 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tools/nolibc: move FD_* definitions to sys/select.h
On 2025-06-22 09:19:58+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 10:21:47AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On 2025-06-20 12:02:50+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Modern programs tend to include sys/select.h to get FD_SET() and
> > > FD_CLR() definitions as well as struct fd_set, but in our case it
> > > didn't exist. Let's move these definitions from types.h to sys/select.h
> > > to help port existing programs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/types.h b/tools/include/nolibc/types.h
> > > index 16c6e9ec9451f..0b51ede4e0a9c 100644
> > > --- a/tools/include/nolibc/types.h
> > > +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/types.h
> > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > > #ifndef _NOLIBC_TYPES_H
> > > #define _NOLIBC_TYPES_H
> > >
> > > +#include "sys/select.h"
> >
> > Is this really necessary?
>
> Not sure what you mean. Do you mean that you would have preferred it
> to be included from nolibc.h instead (which I'm equally fine with) or
> that you'd prefer to have an empty sys/select.h ?
The former.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists