[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DATC6682WCNQ.3JVMT7MRUA4BF@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 22:15:10 +0200
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <rafael@...nel.org>, <ojeda@...nel.org>,
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>, <gary@...yguo.net>,
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
<a.hindborg@...nel.org>, <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] rust: devres: get rid of Devres' inner Arc
On Sun Jun 22, 2025 at 5:45 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 09:05:51AM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> On Thu Jun 12, 2025 at 4:51 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> > + fn remove_action(&self) -> bool {
>> > + // SAFETY:
>> > + // - `self.dev` is a valid `Device`,
>> > + // - the `action` and `data` pointers are the exact same ones as given to devm_add_action()
>> > + // previously,
>> > + // - `self` is always valid, even if the action has been released already.
>> > + (unsafe {
>> > + bindings::devm_remove_action_nowarn(
>> > + self.dev.as_raw(),
>> > + Some(self.callback),
>> > + self.as_ptr().cast_mut().cast(),
>> > + )
>> > + } == 0)
>>
>> I don't think the parenthesis are required?
>
> At least the compiler doesn't seem to be happy about removing them:
>
> error: expected expression, found `==`
> --> rust/kernel/devres.rs:199:11
> |
> 199 | } == 0
> | ^^ expected expression
>
> error[E0308]: mismatched types
> --> rust/kernel/devres.rs:194:13
> |
> 194 | / bindings::devm_remove_action_nowarn(
> 195 | | self.dev.as_raw(),
> 196 | | Some(self.callback),
> 197 | | self.inner().as_ptr().cast_mut().cast(),
> 198 | | )
> | | ^- help: consider using a semicolon here: `;`
> | |_____________|
> | expected `()`, found `i32`
>
> error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Huh... Do you like this better?:
let res = unsafe {
bindings::devm_remove_action_nowarn(
/*
* ...
*/
)
};
res == 0
Maybe it's more readable, but I'm not sure what is more idiomatic in
this case.
---
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists