linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] media: venus: core: Add qcm2290 DT compatible and resource data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aFlchcdWjh4AvWNr@trex>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 15:54:13 +0200
From: Jorge Ramirez <jorge.ramirez@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez@....qualcomm.com>,
        quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com, quic_dikshita@...cinc.com,
        bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org, mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
        konradybcio@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] media: venus: core: Add qcm2290 DT compatible and
 resource data

On 23/06/25 13:51:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/06/2025 12:51, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> > Add a qcm2290 compatible binding to the venus core.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez@....qualcomm.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>
> Wrong order of tags here as well.

but of course, this was not an oversight - I followed what was done in
some other commits (but yeah, I should have remembered not to use past
commits as reference)

> There is a direct example in
> submitting patches, so it is confusing to see something different.
>

yep I remember now when this was pushed 6 years ago (you can find me in
the patch - I was part of some earlier discussion on co-developed. ok
will revisit this doc).