linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8mp: Add initial support for Ultratronik imx8mp-ultra-mach-sbc board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a73b9be-d0d2-448f-91db-209f0d59198c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 16:19:39 +0200
From: Goran Radenovic <goran.radni@...il.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Börge Strümpfel <boerge.struempfel@...il.com>,
 imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8mp: Add initial support for
 Ultratronik imx8mp-ultra-mach-sbc board



Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:17 AM Goran Radenovic <goran.radni@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> I was using git send-email, and I did not notice any problems with
>> dry-run. I have 3 patches and a cover letter. All were marked correctly
>> v3 0/3 - v3 3/3.
>> Everything looks fine here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250620122353.150700-1-goran.radni@gmail.com/
>> Or am I missing something completely?
> 
> I only received the patch 3/3 in my Inbox.
> 
> It seems you missed copying everyone on the three patches.

Thank you for the feedback.

I was using the following configuration in my global .gitconfig:

[sendemail "linux"]
     tocmd = "`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback 
--norolestats --nol"
     cccmd = "`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback 
--norolestats --nom"

So I relied on the automatic recipient generation from get_maintainer.pl.
I didn’t explicitly specify the recipient list, assuming the tool would 
correctly assign To/Cc entries per patch. I’ll make sure to double-check 
and manually adjust if necessary next time.

Thanks again for pointing it out.

Best regards,
Goran