linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/resctrl: using guard to simplify lock/unlock code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d07fe2d9-3548-43fc-b430-2947eee3145b@suswa.mountain>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:11:36 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com, Dave.Martin@....com,
	james.morse@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/resctrl: using guard to simplify lock/unlock code

This seems fine to me, but I don't think anyone is eager to start
reviewing hundreds of guard() conversions unless they're in new code
or part of a bug fix.

regards,
dan carpenter