[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFjhbCnEI7KZW8Sr@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 22:09:00 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, jasowang@...hat.com,
Yongji Xie <xieyongji@...edance.com>, Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoqueli@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Add multiple address spaces support to VDUSE
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 08:25:50AM +0200, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> This code does not touch the DMA API at all. Actually, we could even
> remove all the DMA code and these changes would work the same. Can't
> we just continue with this series and remove the abuse of the DMA API
> in parallel?
But it touches vduse. And vduse is marked broken because it still has
this long standing issues. You don't add "ehancements" to code marked
BROKEN begfore fixing that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists